🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it seems it’s time for a reassessment. Over the years, an event that started out as a commemorative event of history, culture and the connections between international African diaspora communities, has adopted a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate gatherings where individuals of African heritage are paid to speak with predominantly white listeners about implicit prejudice and supportive partnership. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s generated a rise in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. But even that moment has passed. The surge has peaked, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what increasing understanding is for.

The Origins of Black History Month

Originally observed in the US and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with a week of remembrance and recognition in the middle of February. Black History Month developed from this campaign and was officially launched in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the US and Canada in February, but also in October in the United Kingdom, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Holland.

The month has transformed since its inception, placing less emphasis on the accounts of the slave trade across the Atlantic and struggles for equality, and increasingly on notable African descendants in politics, culture, and activism, and broadly celebrating the impact Black people have made to shape the country. It is in schools where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the manner the month is observed is a manifestation of the contemporary political context. How it progresses is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to weakening: the transformation of Black History Month has hindered the purpose of it, which is to tackle structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to rethink Black History Month more than the current time in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a resurgent right in the form of the Reform party is top in opinion ratings. In the recent season we observed the largest far-right rally in the history of Britain. a prominent political figure, the Black leader of the right-wing political group, is a staunch adversary of anti-racism activism, and we are in a position where a elected representative gains confidence to state that “not seeing any white faces” in parts of a city is a source of worry. Simultaneously, far-right parties are surging in the European continent as a entirety.

In the America, a significant offensive against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been carried, often successfully, to the highest courts of the state. A drive to scrub the history of people of color and legacy from the archives is ongoing. One of the former president's early administrative commands focused on the museum of African American legacy, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a organized and extensive campaign to alter the country's historical narrative” by representing the nation “as inherently racist”.

In this context, the month symbolises how little it can be impactful if it is restricted to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or politically neutered festivities of former accomplishments, rather than challenging the realities of the contemporary world. It also demonstrates how its restricted time span means that it is disconnected from the broader ongoing work that is needed. An academic expert, a educator at a learning establishment, articulated it most accurately when she raised concerns about the temporary “tokenism” of the observance. “The problem with embracing a superficial method”, she wrote, “is that it often means that Black History Month evolves into a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to adapt, revise and extend efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a challenging endeavor. There is a inclination to just discontinue observances such as Black History Month entirely, thinking they are inadequate for current needs, or are vestiges of an era that has been ineffective.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and legacy of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, DEI programs, and indeed, including corporate presentations – represent an foundation that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not just to decay as the politics moves on (and in fact, declines), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month appear as? To begin with, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is dispersed across all seasons (as certain organizations are already starting to implement), elements of its material (particularly around historic Black characters) incorporated into school curriculums. It would also be a time that does not avoid politics, and provides room for citizens, particularly young people, to share their anxieties and narratives. What purpose serves basic knowledge of the bygone era when it fails to address the current situation of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the urban areas? Establishments who observe it should not be pacified with the non-confrontational words of “unconscious bias” and sensitivity to minor insults, but faced with the dangers that impact society if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made current, critical, and adaptive. Perhaps an entire name rebrand is required – Contemporary Black History Month.