🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold action to ban social networking access for young people below 16 is creating waves internationally. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and parents are watching with great interest to see if this tactic will become a template for other nations.

Across Europe Trend

Across Europe, a rising group of nations are considering similar restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for under-15s, with the PM declaring that mobile devices and networks are "stealing our kids' youth". A law may be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to enforce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to safeguard young people from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital ID system to authenticate the age and identity of social media users. Officials have indicated that an similar ban could be "a potential measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the president has urged the legislature to pass a law increasing the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has endorsed a related step, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Netherlands has advised parents to prevent their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has adopted a advisory statement supporting a ban for under-16s unless a parent decides otherwise is given. Even though it cautions of the "addictive" design of these platforms, the move does not establish mandatory rules.

"An effective age limit is a solid first step," commented one parliamentarian driving the measure.

Britain: A Cautious Approach

In the UK, the administration has not ruled out a potential ban, stating that "nothing is off the table" but maintaining any decision must be "grounded in strong research".

Last year, momentum built behind a proposal to enact limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end modified. Nonetheless, the government committed to further research the matter.

Advocacy groups have raised concerns. A prominent charity established by the relatives of a teenager who died after encountering dangerous platform posts contends that a strict age ban could fail to protect children and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of harm when young people turn 16.

"This ban is a response to the failure of the tech sector to create platforms and apps that are safe and suitable for young users," stated a leading online safety campaigner.

America: A Decentralized Approach

In the United States, regulation is largely occurring at the state government level amid national inaction.

• Utah requires parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and controls overnight use.
• The state of Florida has passed a bill banning children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation limiting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with any further use dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed measures mandating guardian approval for under-16s to open social media profiles.

Even with widespread concern and calls from certain individuals to mimic this lead, a US-wide ban is presently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Outlook

Apart from Europe and the US, other nations are also exploring options.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for teenagers effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the access age for one major platform to 16.

However, global bodies strike a more nuanced tone. The UN children's agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "could backfire". The organization notes that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for isolated youth and that government action should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to prioritize safety.

As this worldwide conversation continues, the actions of this nation and several other countries show that policymakers internationally are less and less content to stand by for platforms to self-regulate.